![]() ![]() It’s interesting to see the relative newcomers, Fusion360 and Onshape doing so well in the survey while some of the market share leaders are not quite as well reviewed. #3: Tied at 1.4 were Onshape and Inventor Others people would’ve liked to be able to give more than just 3 strengths. One other metric is what I’ll call “Enthusiasm.” Some of the packages are well liked, but nobody could say why or few did. Here are the category winners for strengths: Sketching/2D, Import/Export, and good support for Assemblies is also valued. For this audience of CNC’ers, the best CAD package is easy to use, integrated with CAM, has a vibrant ecosystem, is productive, cost-effective, parametric, has good simulation and support. Ease of Use: 20% of responses named this one.Įverything else was 2% or less.Here are the most popular categories in order of popularity That’s a pretty long list–our respondents varied in their ideas of what features were most appealing. Workgroup: Version control or often just the ability to move from PC to PC seamlessly.Direct Modeling: There’s an active move in the CAD world to allow non-parametric or Direct Modeling.Mac: Does it run on a Mac? Many brought this up as important to them.Import/Export: How well does the package work and play with others in terms of file formats?.Assemblies: Ability to work with large assemblies.Rendering/Graphics: Overall quality of rendering and graphics.Simulation: Is there simulation such as kinetic or FEA?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |